The Effect Of Transformational Leadership On Employee Performance Intervened By Motivation And Work Discipline In The Regional Technical Implementation Unit Of Public Works And Spatial Planning Binjai Public Works And Spatial Planning Office Of North Suma

Authors

  • Swandi Pinem Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi
  • Abdi Sugiarto Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi

Keywords:

transformational leadership, Motivation, Job Satisfaction, Employee Performance

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of transformational leadership on employee performance with work discipline and motivation as intervening variables in the Binjai Regional Technical Implementation Unit of the Public Works and Spatial Planning Office of North Sumatra Province. The research method used is quantitative with Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) analysis based on Partial Least Square (PLS). The research data shows that transformational leadership has a positive and significant influence on work discipline with an influence coefficient of 0.777, T-Statistic of 16.266 (> 1.96), and P-Value of 0.000 (< 0.05). In addition, transformational leadership also has a significant influence on motivation with an influence coefficient of 0.897, T-Statistic of 49.932 (> 1.96), and P-Value of 0.000 (< 0.05). Work discipline was proven to have a positive and significant influence on employee performance with an influence coefficient of 0.538, T-Statistic of 4.688 (> 1.96), and P-Value of 0.000 (< 0.05). Motivation also has a significant influence on employee performance with an influence coefficient of 0.329, T-Statistic of 2.078 (> 1.96), and P-Value of 0.040 (< 0.05). The indirect influence of transformational leadership on employee performance through work discipline is also significant, with an influence coefficient of 0.418, T-Statistic of 4.442 (> 1.96), and P-Value of 0.000 (< 0.05). Similarly, the indirect influence of transformational leadership on employee performance through motivation proved significant, with an influence coefficient of 0.295, T-Statistic of 2.058 (> 1.96), and P-Value of 0.042 (< 0.05). These results show that work discipline and motivation function as intervening variables that strengthen the relationship between transformational leadership and employee performance. This research provides important insights into how transformational leadership styles can influence key elements of human resources such as work discipline, motivation, and performance, and provides practical guidance for organizations to improve productivity.

References

Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2018). Transformational Leadership (2nd ed.). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315200015

Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., & Avolio Suny-Bmghamton, B. J. (1993). Spaef Transformational Leadership and Organizational Culture Transformational Leadership and Organizational Culture. Public Administration Quarterly, 17(1), 112–121.

Chandra, V., Yedija, William, C., & Margono, A. (2021). The effect of satisfaction at work in employee turnover intention. Journal of Economic and Business Research, 14(3), 28–40. http://journals.usm.ac.id/index.php/jre

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2020). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7

Fuller, B., Bajaba, A., & Bajaba, S. (2022). Enhancing and extending the meta-analytic comparison of newer genre leadership forms. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(April), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872568

Gagne, M., & Deci, E. L. (2019). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(3), 331–341. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2377

Harvida, D. A., & Wijaya, C. (2020). Factors influencing employee turnover and retention strategies as employee turnover prevention: A literature review. Journal of State Administration Sciences, 16(1), 13–23.

Hendrawijaya, A. T. (2020). Human resource management in improving students' academic achievement mediated by teacher's performance. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(1), 242–253. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(1).2020.21

Jotabá, M. N., Fernandes, C. I., Gunkel, M., & Kraus, S. (2022). Innovation and human resource management: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(6), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-07-2021-0330

Lusiani, M., Abidin, Z., Fitrianingsih, D., Yusnita, E., Adiwinata, D., Rachmaniah, D., Mukhlasin, Fauzi, A., & Purwanto, A. (2020). Effect of servant, digital and green leadership toward business performance: Evidence from Indonesian manufacturing. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(11), 1351–1361. https://doi.org/10.31838/srp.2020.11.192

Madzimure, J. (2020). Higher education leadership practices and challenges in a changing world: The case of a university of technology. Eurasian Journal of Business and Management, 8(4), 282–291. https://doi.org/10.15604/ejbm.2020.08.04.001

Michael Galanakis, & Giannis Peramatzis. (2022). Herzberg's motivation theory in workplace. Journal of Psychology Research, 12(12), 971–978. https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5542/2022.12.009

Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and Practice (9th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Osman, A., Jalil, M. B., & Kabir, A. I. (2022). Strategic human resource management, human capital management and talent management: Same goals many routes? Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 21(S1), 1–15.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational Behavior (18th ed.). Pearson Education.

Runa, R. (2020). Determination of job satisfaction and employee performance: Motivation, leadership style (A literature review of human resource management). Journal of Applied Management Sciences, 2(2), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.31933/jimt.v2i2.335

Sekaran, U., Lai, L., Ussiri, D. A. N., Kumar, S., & Clay, S. (2021). Role of integrated crop-livestock systems in improving agriculture production and addressing food security – A review. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 5, 100190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2021.100190

Siangchokyoo, N., Klinger, R. L., & Campion, E. D. (2020). Follower transformation as the linchpin of transformational leadership theory: A systematic review and future research agenda. Leadership Quarterly, 31(1), 101341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101341

Sugiyono, S. (2021). The evaluation of facilities and infrastructure standards achievement of vocational high school in the Special Region of Yogyakarta. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 25(2), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v25i2.46002

Suharyani, Y. D., Riyanto, S., Saluy, A. B., & Elmi, F. (2024). Leadership model in improving mine inspector performance: A systematic review. Journal of Leadership Studies, 3(3), 50–61.

Taştan, S. B., Davoudi, S. M. M., Masalimova, A. R., Bersanov, A. S., Kurbanov, R. A., Boiarchuk, A. V., & Pavlushin, A. A. (2018). The impacts of teacher's efficacy and motivation on student's academic achievement in science education among secondary and high school students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), 2353–2366. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/89579

Truitt, S. (2023). Self-determination theory and expressive arts therapy: A path to needs satisfaction and mindful autonomous motivation. Expressive Therapies Capstone Theses Graduate School of Arts and Social Sciences.

Ulum, M., Tirta, I. M., & Anggraen, D. (2014). Structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis for small samples with a partial least square (PLS) approach. National Seminar on Mathematics.

Yukl, G. (2020). Leadership in Organizations (9th ed.). Pearson Education.

Zainul, M., & Harlie, M. (2022). Performance model development organization and service image integrate system service leadership and innovation society organization to face global. Multicultural Education, 8(1), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5842426

Downloads

Published

10-02-2025